[Coral-List] Shark Feeding Question
Steve Mussman
sealab at earthlink.net
Tue Feb 18 10:22:57 EST 2014
David and Billy,
While you both expertly appeal to common sense, it seems that science today
prefers to reflect popular culture rather than challenge its transgressions.
At the risk of sounding sanctimonious, the trend is ominous because it
is likely an indication of what's to come. Diverting from established
doctrine (pertaining to the general practice of feeding wildlife), the
conclusions cited in a number of recent papers on the subject of shark
feeding seem to suggest that conservation efforts and protected area
management would best be served by facing reality and accepting things for
what they are or at the very least, finding creative ways to subscribe to
and benefit from what they have become. Although this may be the most
pragmatic approach, it gives the impression that authoritative scientific
objectivity has given way to the whims of shifting societal values and
beliefs. For the time being, those who condone shark feeding are provided
cover from the full range of implications that may result from these
activities by a fog of ambiguity. There is no hard scientific evidence to
contend with and they know full well that by the time enough data is
collected and crunched, baselines will have been obscured and a new era of
"novel natural communities" will have taken hold. This is pretty much as it
always has been. Humankind will by then have moved on and adjusted to a new
reality remorseless in reaction to the impacts of its intrusion. After all,
baselines reflecting the pristine conditions that once existed on coral
reefs of the past are little more than a fading memory becoming more
mystical, unfamiliar and elusive with every passing day.
Hoping for change.
With best regards,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
>From: Billy Causey - NOAA Federal
>Sent: Feb 18, 2014 8:49 AM
>To: David Obura
>Cc: "coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov"
>Subject: Re: [Coral-List] Shark Feeding Question
>
>David,
>It's always great to hear from you! You made some excellent points in
>your response and I agree with all of them.
>
>Please allow me to share a short story from the mid - 1980's when I
>was managing the small Looe Key National Marine Sanctuary in the Lower
>Florida Keys. At the time, we allowed fishing on top of the fore reef
>and the spur and groove formation. Now that area is a no take
>Sanctuary Preservation Area.
>
>Back to the story, one day I received a call from an older, excited
>recreational fisherman who exclaimed that "this sanctuary thing was
>working!" He said he had tied up to one of our mooring buoys and
>caught his limit in huge Yellowtail Snapper in minutes! What he
>didn't know was that he was catching fish that divers had been feeding
>crackers, cheese whiz and all sorts of food matter to the fish. The
>old fishermen had found a gold mine of fish that had been conditioned
>to bite anything that hit the water!! But, he liked that sanctuary
>thing!!
>
>A sad, but true story that was frequently repeated .
>
>Cheers,
>Billy
>
>Billy D. Causey, Ph.D..
>Southeast Regional Director
>NOAA's Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
>
>33 East Quay Road
>Key West, Florida 33040
>
>Phone:
>305 809 4670 office
>305 395 0150 mobile
>305 293 5011 fax
>
>Email:
>billy..causey at noaa.gov
>
>
>> On Feb 18, 2014, at 7:30 AM, David Obura wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> general experience with feeding or attracting wild animals (which fish
and sharks are) in Africa has been that the direct result of increased
human-animal interactions is precisely what you could predict. Where those
animals are nice and cuddly, the interactions are probably beneficial (at
least to humans). Where they are large or potentially dangerous (hippos,
leopard, elephant, lion), then, surprise surprise, the number of harmful
interactions on humans go up!! Where habitat loss also results in
intensification of human-wildlife interactions you also see the same
results, of greater harmful interactions to people, though hardly in
proportion to the increase in harmful interactions for the animals.
>>
>> Finding published literature on this can be difficult (though I'm sure
its extensive in terrestrial cases) because it is of course so emotive to us
- but it is common sense. The micro-view of pro-feeders, centered around
their own business opportunity or "I know my backyard" mentality should not
be given excessive weight against what is common sense AND backed up by a
mix of experience and data from the broader world out there!
>>
>> My two cents, anyway,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CORDIO East Africa
>> #9 Kibaki Flats, Kenyatta Beach, Bamburi Beach
>> P.O.BOX 10135 Mombasa 80101, Kenya
>> www.cordioea.net // www.iucn.org/cccr
>> Mobile: 254-715 067417
>> Email: dobura at cordioea.net; davidobura at gmail.com
>> Skype dobura
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Coral-List mailing list
>> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>> http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
>_______________________________________________
>Coral-List mailing list
>Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list